A Guide to the Validation of Clinical Study In The UK

A Guide to the validation of clinical study data is one of the most important documents that the medical writer will ever need. It is an extremely complex document and should only be used when you have the utmost confidence in the validity and reliability of the data being presented. In this article, I will discuss the various reasons why I believe that you should never rely on one source of validation for your clinical trial results. Validation of clinical study

Gaining A Better Understanding

Clinical studies are not like simple scientific experiments that end in one or two results. They take many years to conduct and involve many different people from all over the world. When conducting a clinical trial, all data and information is kept confidential. Therefore, the data collection and analysis should also be kept in confidential quarters. The process of clinical research involves many different procedures and this is why it is so important that the validation process is performed by someone who has a lot of experience in this field.   As previously mentioned, clinical trials involve a lot of people and all their information. There are a few ways that a person could try to get their information into the public domain but these are not without risks. For instance, if the wrong clinical trial data is presented in a publication, there is a chance that a new scientific finding will be published in a journal that will have major ramifications for the field of medicine. However, if the wrong data is presented in a publication, it is very difficult to get this information out to the scientific community. This is why it is so important that the validation of clinical study data takes place in person, and not via a paper. Clinical study validation

Further Reading

I would not be the least bit surprised if you are reading this article and are wondering what happens to the clinical study information after it is submitted to journals for publication. That is where the real work begins. Once the validation is complete, you as the clinical researcher will want to see the published results in full color on your monitor. If something looks different on your computer screen than it does in the journal, there is a good chance that you have a valid finding. In fact, you may even find that you can use the actual data on hand at that point to further test the validity of your findings. The next step that the validation of clinical study data takes is the fact that you must have a way to make sure that you get a statistically significant result. Many investigators choose to use a significance level of p>0.10. If a finding is significant at the 10% level of p, then we call it a finding and we can accept that it has been statistically significant. However, the best way to actually be able to document that a clinical trial had statistically significant findings is to follow up with the investigators. It sounds a little strange but people do not follow up with their researchers because they are afraid that they might make a mistake.


The investigators that oversee clinical trials all have data that they present to the FDA or other regulatory agency. They need to validate the data in order to ensure that the clinical study was as good as it could be. This sounds simple enough, right? However, it can take years for clinical study data to come into the Clinical Trials registry. That is why you should contact an expert in the area of clinical documentation after you find out how to validate clinical trials.